|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Thursday, September 22, 2011
|
Imprelis Damage Request Letter from Ohio Department of Agriculture.
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
|
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Friday, July 29, 2011
|
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Friday, July 29, 2011
|
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Friday, July 29, 2011
|
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Friday, July 29, 2011
|
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Friday, July 1, 2011
|
If you have damage in excess of $500, you should report this
to the Ohio Department of Agriculture.
To do so, fax the following information to the ODA
614-728-4235:
1. Your company name, address and phone
2. Your customers name, address and phone
3. The date of application
4. The date you were notified of damage.
5. A list of Imprelis applications you have done this year.
6. Mowing practices; are you blowing clippings into trees?
Or call the ODA, Jim Belt at 614-728-6389 or 800-282-1955 x
31 and an ODA representative can answer your questions.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By OLCA Staff,
Friday, July 1, 2011
|
Imprelis™ Technical Bulletin
Imprelis, from DuPont™, is a systemic, broad-spectrum, selective
broadleaf herbicide for use in lawn care operations. The active ingredient is Potassium salt of
aminocyclopyrachlor. This new lawn care herbicide was registered
for use in 2010 and was widely-used in many markets across the US in
2011. Its mode of action is by foliar
and root uptake. Its formulations allow
applications as a liquid spray or as a granule.
It provides good control of several persistent perennial weeds such as
wild violets and ground ivy. An added
characteristic of this herbicide is that it also provides efficacy when applied
during periods of rainfall. It is
effective at very low use rates of 0.07 lb active ingredient/acre or 4.5 oz/Acre. On fertilizer granules the use rate is 0.07 –
0.1 lb ai/acre.
Within the past few weeks (late May/early June), there have
been several reports of plant damage on properties that received an Imprelis
application in April. At present, the
plants most affected have been Norway spruce (Picea abies) and white pine (Pinus
strobus). Blue spruce (Picea pungens) trees may also be
affected but there have been fewer reports of damage. Moderate to large trees have exhibited damage
to varying degrees and seen as twisting and curling (epinasty),
discoloration/blanching, and browning of the newer growth (as seen in pictures
below). There is also some damage
suspected on other landscape ornamental plants such as Honeylocust, Taxus, and arborvitae.
The Ohio Lawn Care Association is working towards collecting
as much information as possible regarding suspected plant damage following
Imprelis applications. While much is yet
unknown, we will strive to keep our membership and the Green Industry at large
informed as to developments on this topic.
Please see additional resources available here and by following the
hyperlinks to several university updates below.
OLCA will continue to monitor developments and update this site
frequently.

This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Friday, July 1, 2011
|
Article on Imprelis from Rutgers University, New Jersey, June 30, 2011
Download File (PDF)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Denise Brosie, Ohio Lawn Care Association,
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
|
A. CHEMICAL CONUNDRUMS.
Navigating suspected chemical injury for green industry companies is
challenging on many levels. This includes the diagnostic dilemmas we have
already noted in this BYGL, and the many diverse communications issues that
arise. Here are two examples of these challenges relative to questions that have
emerged regarding Norway spruce, Black Hills and white pine injury and possible
association with Imprelis herbicide applications.
First, according to James Belt, Agriculture Inspection Manager of ODA, the
Ohio Administrative Code 901:5-11-02(D) indicates:
Pesticide applicators:
(4) Shall report to the department of agriculture:
(b) By written report within ten calendar days after learning of any property
damage in excess of five hundred dollars resulting from or allegedly resulting
from a pesticide used by the pesticide applicator or a trained service person,
immediate family member or subordinate employee working under the pesticide
applicator's direct supervision.
Ohio Revised Code 921.24: Prohibited Acts
No person shall do any of the following:
(Q) Refuse or fail to comply with this chapter, the rules adopted thereunder,
or any lawful order of the director;
Secondly, Jim Chatfield recently met with Dr. John Lloyd, Chief Science
Officer of the Rainbow Companies, based in the Twin Cities of Minnesota. John
shared aspects of their communication with their customers from Rainbow Treecare
President Greg Krogstad:
This week we have been receiving more calls
regarding spruce [Norway and Black Hills] and pine damage due to Imprelis
Herbicide. There was a letter sent out [to] Lawncare clients that we know have
spruce and pine trees. Hundreds of companies have been using Imprelis this year
so you may certainly see damage on properties. Lawncare will look at the
property and talk with the client.
For now, we are not recommending anything for the
declining trees. We have attempted [applications of] POM [Prescription Organic
Matter]. We are waiting until DuPont instructs us on how to proceed. We will not
remove the tree until we know what DuPont requires to support the claim.
The trees were not accidentally sprayed; it
appears to be a systemic issue where roots are absorbing the compound. Newly
planted, root-bound trees, do not appear to be impacted like mature, established
trees. This is due to the application occurring over lawn areas and not under or
around trees.
Please feel confident when discussing the Imprelis
issue with clients. You may have some very upset clients. Remind them that the
product was released in fall of last year and we waited before using it. All
research showed Imprelis to be the least toxic, landscape friendly product on
the market. It fits our commitment to low toxic, low input options and their
property was not in any way a test site. We will correct the problems, but need
to work with DuPont because they have responsibility in the matter.
As BYGL goes to press, John notes that the issue in the Twin Cities is now
gaining local media attention.
These are just a few reminders that the green industry is a challenging
business. As Joshua J. Marine noted: "Challenges are what make life
interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful."
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|